Antigravity CLI vs Cursor — Feature Comparison
Quick answer: Antigravity CLI supports 15 of 18 tracked features; Cursor supports 12 of 18. Matrix last updated July 14, 2026.
Verdict: Antigravity vs Cursor
Cursor is the better choice for most developers, but Antigravity CLI is the right pick for terminal-centric or server-side workflows where MCP Server support is critical. Cursor edges ahead on tracked feature coverage (15/18 vs 14/18) and notably supports Multi-file Editing and VS Code integration — two capabilities that meaningfully raise productivity for developers working across large codebases in a familiar IDE environment. Antigravity CLI counters with MCP Server support, which Cursor lacks, making it a strong contender for teams building or operating in model-context-protocol ecosystems or headless environments. On release cadence, Antigravity CLI has shipped 11 releases in the past 90 days compared to Cursor's 9, suggesting a faster iteration cycle that may appeal to early adopters who want frequent updates — though Cursor's larger total release count (19 vs 11 tracked) implies a more established, longer-running product. Neither tool dominates comprehensively: the right choice hinges on workflow. Developers who spend most of their time in VS Code or need to refactor across multiple files simultaneously will find Cursor's feature set more directly useful. Those who prefer command-line interfaces, need MCP Server capabilities, or are integrating AI assistance into automated pipelines will find Antigravity CLI better aligned with their needs. Both tools are actively maintained and closely matched on features, so the decision ultimately comes down to environment and the specific capabilities each team values most.
Choose Antigravity CLI if: Choose Antigravity CLI if you work primarily in the terminal, operate in headless or automated environments, or specifically need MCP Server support that Cursor does not provide.
Choose Cursor if: Choose Cursor if you want a full IDE experience with VS Code integration and need robust multi-file editing capabilities to navigate and refactor large codebases efficiently.
Key differences
- Cursor supports VS Code integration and Multi-file Editing; Antigravity CLI does not
- Antigravity CLI supports MCP Server; Cursor does not
- Antigravity CLI has a faster recent release cadence (11 releases in 90 days vs Cursor's 9), while Cursor has a larger total tracked release history
- Cursor leads slightly on overall tracked feature coverage (15/18 vs 14/18)
- Antigravity CLI suits terminal and pipeline workflows; Cursor targets IDE-based developer workflows
At a glance
| Tool | Latest version | Release date | Releases tracked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antigravity CLI | v1.1.2 | July 13, 2026 | 16 |
| Cursor | v3.11 | July 10, 2026 | 21 |
Core Editing
Multi-file editing, streaming, undo capabilities
| Feature | Antigravity | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-file Editing — Edit multiple files in a single operation | — | ✓ (Implied by the AI coding tool nature and Canvas Design Mode; multi-file editing is a core Cursor capability evidenced ac) |
| Streaming Output — Real-time streaming of AI responses | ✓ since 1.1.0 | — |
| Undo/Redo — Ability to undo and redo changes | ✓ since 1.0.13 | — |
| Diff View — Visual comparison of changes | ✓ since 1.1.2 | ✓ (Standard feature for AI coding tools built on VS Code; supported as a core editing capability) |
Terminal Integration
Shell and command execution support
| Feature | Antigravity | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Command Execution — Run shell commands | ✓ since 1.1.2 | ✓ since 1.6 |
| Shell Integration — Integration with user shell environment | ✓ (v1.0.15 mentions 'editor support' and Windows compatibility; tmux session support mentioned in v1.0.14 indicates shell e) | — |
| Background Tasks — Run tasks in background | ✓ since 1.1.2 | ✓ since 2.5 |
MCP Support
Model Context Protocol server and client capabilities
| Feature | Antigravity | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| MCP Client — Connect to MCP servers | ✓ since 1.1.2 | ✓ since 3.10 |
| MCP Server — Expose as MCP server | ✓ since 1.1.2 | — |
| Custom Tools — Define and use custom tools | ✓ (v1.0.10 mentions 'builtin skill' system; v1.0.13 references 'skill commands with slash prefix', indicating a custom skil) | ✓ (v3.9 'Customize Cursor' and MCP support in v3.10 suggest custom tool definition capabilities) |
IDE Integrations
VS Code, JetBrains, and other editor support
| Feature | Antigravity | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| VS Code — Visual Studio Code integration | — | ✓ (Cursor is built on VS Code, making VS Code integration a core foundational feature) |
| JetBrains — IntelliJ/WebStorm integration | — | — |
| Vim/Neovim — Vim or Neovim integration | ✓ since 1.0.15 | — |
| Web UI — Browser-based interface | ✓ since 1.0.13 | ✓ since 1.7 |
Agentic Features
Planning, tool use, and autonomous capabilities
| Feature | Antigravity | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Planning Mode — Plan before executing changes | ✓ since 1.1.0 | ✓ since 2.2 |
| Autonomous Mode — Extended autonomous operation | ✓ since 1.1.2 | ✓ since 3.8 |
| Task Decomposition — Break complex tasks into steps | ✓ since 1.1.0 | ✓ since 3.2 |
| Context Management — Manage context across conversations | ✓ since 1.1.0 | ✓ since 3.7 |
Release velocity
Havoptic tracks 16 Antigravity releases and 21 Cursor releases. See release frequency charts for side-by-side velocity analysis, or browse the Antigravity CLI changelog and Cursor changelog.
Data source
Feature data is maintained in feature-matrix.json under a CC-BY-4.0 license. Release data comes from releases.json. Both are updated daily. See the methodology page for details on sourcing and human review.